This MetsMoneyline report covers Mets vs Philadelphia Phillies on 2026-06-27, including starting pitcher matchups, lineup splits, bullpen form, weather context, and the site's official Mets moneyline pick.
| Situation | Record | Avg R | Avg RA |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs PHI | 1-3 25% | 3 | 6.8 |
| Home games | 18-23 44% | 4.3 | 4.9 |
| Day games | 15-18 45% | 4 | 4 |
| Saturdays | 4-8 33% | 3.7 | 4.3 |
| Home days | 9-10 47% | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Matchup Details
| New York Mets | Category | Philadelphia Phillies |
|---|---|---|
| N/A | Odds | N/A |
| 34-48 | Season Record | 46-36 |
| 0-5 | Last 5 Record | 4-1 |
| 18-23 (home) | Home/Away Record | 23-17 (away) |
| 1-3 | Season Series Record | 3-1 |
Starting Pitchers Comparison

| Date | Opp | IP | ER | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06-11 | St. Louis Cardinals | 4.2 | 4 | 6 |
| 06-05 | San Diego Padres | 5.2 | 0 | 3 |
| 05-30 | Miami Marlins | 5.0 | 1 | 8 |
| NYM Christian Scott | 2026 | PHI Offense |
|---|---|---|
5.6%
7.5%
75th %ile
|
Barrel % | 8.4
7.5%
#19 MLB
|
0.246
0.248
55th %ile
|
xBA | 0.254
0.248
#7 MLB
|
31.8%
37%
84th %ile
|
Hard Hit % | 41.4
37%
#10 MLB
|
0.384
0.400
62nd %ile
|
xSLG % | 0.418
0.400
#13 MLB
|
| NYM Christian Scott | 2026 | PHI Profile |
|---|---|---|
Right
|
Pitching Hand / vs Split |
vs Right-handed pitching
|
42.1
|
Innings Pitched / Plate Appearances |
2127
|
26.4%
22.5%
80th %ile
|
K% | 23.2
22.5%
#22 MLB
|
10.7%
8.2%
39th %ile
|
BB% | 7.8
8.2%
#27 MLB
|

| Date | Opp | IP | ER | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06-25 | Washington Nationals | 1.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 06-22 | Washington Nationals | 1.0 | 1 | 2 |
| 06-17 | Miami Marlins | 2.0 | 0 | 3 |
| PHI Tim Mayza | 2026 | NYM Offense |
|---|---|---|
5.2%
7.5%
78th %ile
|
Barrel % | 9.6
7.5%
#9 MLB
|
0.23
0.248
70th %ile
|
xBA | 0.26
0.248
#6 MLB
|
42.3%
37%
39th %ile
|
Hard Hit % | 42.8
37%
#8 MLB
|
0.354
0.400
74th %ile
|
xSLG % | 0.441
0.400
#4 MLB
|
| PHI Tim Mayza | 2026 | NYM Profile |
|---|---|---|
Left
|
Pitching Hand / vs Split |
vs Left-handed pitching
|
36.1
|
Innings Pitched / Plate Appearances |
2019
|
25%
22.5%
75th %ile
|
K% | 22.3
22.5%
#18 MLB
|
5%
8.2%
90th %ile
|
BB% | 7.9
8.2%
#25 MLB
|
Bullpen Report
Recent Form — Last 20 Games vs Season
Projected Lineup Comparison
How This Analysis Is Built
MetsMoneyline builds each report from the game context already stored by the site: projected or confirmed lineups, starting pitcher indicators, bullpen form, recent team performance, and the available Mets market price. The goal is to show where the Mets may have a real edge, where the matchup is fragile, and why the official pick is framed the way it is.
This analysis is informational and entertainment-focused only. It is not a guarantee of results, and it should be read as a transparent game breakdown rather than a promise of profit.
Game Analysis
- No single dominant Mets edge. Lineup quality is the primary case.
- Tim Mayza has the better pitching profile: K% 25% vs 26.4%, FIP 3.28 vs 3.84.
- Overall lineup quality only: projected WAR 6.2 vs 7.3, projected lineup wRC+ 103.3 vs 107.8, xwOBA 0.332 vs 0.322.
Model leans opponent, but Mets ML is still the play based on the best available angle.
Official MetsMoneyline Pick
Mets ML with measured edge
Recent form: Mets are 0-5 in the last 5; rest is 0 vs 0 days. Starting pitching: Christian Scott 4.46 xERA, 2.98 ERA, N/A% K vs Tim Mayza 3.03 xERA, 2.97 ERA, N/A% K; Offense: Mets wRC+ 90.0 vs 93.0; Bullpen: Mets xERA 3.69 vs 3.23. Price: Mets ML 0 implies 0.0% vs model 35.0%; value edge +35.0 points; Pick: New York Mets moneyline.
- No single dominant Mets edge. Lineup quality is the primary case.
- Tim Mayza has the better pitching profile: K% 25% vs 26.4%, FIP 3.28 vs 3.84.
- Overall lineup quality only: projected WAR 6.2 vs 7.3, projected lineup wRC+ 103.3 vs 107.8, xwOBA 0.332 vs 0.322.
Primary edge: Christian Scott versus Tim Mayza with 4.46 xERA against 3.03. Secondary checks: offense 90.0 vs 93.0 wRC+, bullpen 3.69 vs 3.23 xERA, value edge +35.0 points. Value check: Mets ML 0 with 0.0% implied and 35.0% model probability; value edge +35.0 points.
Official Pick: Mets ML
Confidence: Low (4/10)